The search for healthy soil biology indicators

Introduction by Patrick Francis

The following article was published in the Soil Science Society of America e-news in October 2021 as a review of a published paper about developing indicators to describe what is a healthy soil from a biological perspective. The research conducted in Ontario Canada, highlights just how complex soil biology is and the impacts plant species and management have. The researchers may have discovered a relatively good indicator of soil biological health which could have widespread application for comparing management impacts on farms with similar soil types, rainfall and temperatures. Unfortunately the trial methodology seems far from representative of actual cropping and grazing practice. The cropping plots were sown with the same species for 18 years in a row while the pasture plots were either a single grass species or a combination single grass and legume species  and were not grazed by livestock, simply mown twice a year for 18 years. Whether or not the methodology exaggerates or underestimates soil biology differences is not known, what is important to learn is tests to help determine soil biological health are being investigated.

By Eric Hamilton

Soils, like people, can be healthy or unhealthy. We’ve recently learned how important the microbes inside our bodies are to human health. Likewise, soil health depends on a complex group of microbes. These bacteria and fungi recycle nutrients and prepare the soils to better support plants.

But understanding what leads to healthy soils remains a challenge. Even defining “healthy” soils, and then measuring that health, hasn’t quite been settled by science. New research is uncovering the secrets of healthy soil in greater detail. This information can help farmers and, in turn, consumers.

“Understanding the management practices that lead to healthier soils will allow farmers to grow the same crops while reducing costly chemical inputs (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides) and protecting the environment,” says Lori Phillips, a scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Phillips and her colleagues recently studied the soil health in a long-term study of different farming practices. They discovered what kinds of plant growth supported healthy soils. And they tested a new system for measuring soil health, which could help other scientists study the same issue in the future.

The field experiment started in 2001. Located in Ontario, the study is designed to study the long-term effects of different crop-growth systems. They compared pasture systems with those planted with typical corn and soybean crops. Phillips and her colleagues asked how 18 years of continuous growth of corn, soybeans or perennial grasses affected soil health.

Corn was planted every year on these plots since 2001. While the corn fields had healthier soils than soybean fields, their soils weren’t as healthy as those growing perennial grasses. Photo: Lori Phillips

To find the answer, they had to first decide how to measure soil health. In years past, this mostly meant how much organic matter is in soil. But organic matter changes slowly. Microbes change fast.

“These microbial communities could be considered to be a ‘canary in a coal mine’ for soil health,” says Phillips. Measuring them quickly yet accurately is important.

So, the scientists turned to a test called “CNPS.” CNPS measures enzymes involved in carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous and sulfur nutrient cycles in the soil. It produces a holistic measure of biological activity. They also looked at the variety of fungi and bacteria in the soil and the ratio between these groups of microbes.

Figure 1: Soil C pools and total N under grasses, corn, and soybean systems in Woodslee, ON (n = 4). Treatments that do not share a letter are significantly different at p < .05. CNPS, C, N, P, and S cycling activity; ITS, internal transcribed spacer; FAME, fatty acid methyl ester; CRF + BT, creeping red fescue and birdsfoot trefoil mix; SOM, soil organic matter; POXC, permanganate oxidizable C; TC, total C; TN, total N; NS, not significant.

The perennial grasses had the healthiest soils. They had lots of biological activity and diverse microbes. They also hosted lots of fungi. The fields growing both a perennial grass and a legume called birdsfoot trefoil were especially healthy. Fields constantly growing soybeans, another legume, came in last place. Corn fields were between the two.

Figure 2: Biological indicators of soil health under grasses, corn, and soybean systems in Woodslee, ON (n = 4). Treatments that do not share a letter are significantly different p < .05. CRF + BT, creeping red fescue and birdsfoot trefoil mix; CNPS, biogeochemical index using combined enzyme activity assay; FAMEs, microbial abundance via the sum of ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL-FAME) markers; PNP, p-nitrophenol.

Legumes like birdsfoot trefoil and soybeans can produce their own nitrogen, a useful trait in agriculture. But that doesn’t always lead to stronger soils, especially for soybeans, says Phillips.

The grass “creeping red fescue” and the legume “birdsfoot trefoil” produced the healthiest soils in the study. Healthy soils had lots of biological activity, diverse microbes, and plenty of fungi. Photo: Lori Phillips

“Many people assume that because soybean is a legume and legumes provide their own nitrogen through nitrogen fixation, that soybean must be healthy for the soils,” she says. But most of the nitrogen gets taken away in the soybeans, and what’s left behind is less useful. “So, it’s the cumulative effect of smaller roots, less residue returned, and the residue that is returned gets broken down too quickly to be stable.”

The perennial systems also had more fungi than the crop fields. Since the perennial grasslands weren’t plowed, they had more time to build up strong microbial communities. “Intensively managed agricultural soils, with more frequent tillage and high fertilizer inputs, tend to be dominated by bacteria. In contrast, more sustainable management practices increase the overall amount of fungi in soil,” says Phillips. Fungi hold onto soil, reducing erosion.

Having tested the CNPS measuring system, the scientists learned that it’s a useful new tool for capturing soil health. And by uncovering what kinds of farm practices produce healthier soils, Phillips’ team can help farmers understand how to protect this vital resource.

“Agricultural management practices that reduce soil disturbance, reduce chemical inputs, and increase the amount of time the soil is covered by a living crop all contribute to improved soil biological health,” says Phillips. “Improved soil biological health will lead to more profitable and sustainable farms.”

Reference:

“An evaluation of biological soil health indicators in four long-term continuous agroecosystems in Canada”

Lumarie Pérez-Guzmán,Lori A. Phillips,Brent J. Seuradge,Ikechukwu Agomoh,Craig F. Drury,Verónica Acosta-Martínez

First published: 12 June 2021 in Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Journal, a publication of the Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy.

https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20164

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *